"Justice belongs in the most valuable catagory [of goods]. It is the good that the happy man loves for both for its own sake and for the effects it produces."
--Glaucon
The Layout of the Argument
Glaucon divides his opinions on the qualities of justice and unjustice into three arguments:
1. The nature and origin of justice, according to the commoner.
2. All who practice justice do so against their will.
3. The life of the unjust man is far better than the life of the just man.
Glaucon's Social Contract Theory
Glaucon explains how most men think that being unjust is good but suffering injustice is bad. The common man usually comes upon the following conclusion: "justice is unattainable and injustice is unavoidable." Glaucon concludes the first part with the quote, "Only those are just who lack the power to be unjust," and the story of the ring of Gyges.
The Ring of Gyges
The story of the ring of Gyges is an important work that supports the argument of Glaucon. Gyges was a shepherd in the kingdom of Lydia. One day, a great storm opened a chasm in the fields where Gyges' sheep were grazing. He found a dead body with a golden ring in the chasm and took it for his own.
When the shepherds met with the king to talk about their flocks, he turned the stone on the ring and became invisible. Once he discovered the advantages of such a ring, he was quickly appointed one of the king's messengers, seduced the queen, killed the king, and became the new king of Lydia.
The story of Gyges' ring shows that most people would commit unjust actions if they could avoid punishment. It supports Glaucon's conclusions by showing that men will be just only if constrained. People value justice for its consequences. If the consequences are removed, no one would value justice. Glaucon suggests that everyone would behave the way Gyges did.